【당사자】
In re the MARRIAGE OF Charlene and James GUASCH.
Charlene Guasch, Respondent,
v.
James Guasch, Respondent.
Pamela Carmody, Intervener and Appellant.
【대리인】
Lawrence D. Miller, Belmont, for Appellant.
Donald E. Kilmer, San Jose, for Respondent.
【전문】
ELIA, J.
Appellant Pamela Carmody served a writ of execution on community property held by respondents Charlene and James Guasch, who were undergoing marital dissolution proceedings. The family court granted Charlene's request to quash the writ of execution and enjoin further enforcement of a default judgment appellant had obtained against James after his separation from Charlene. Appellant contends that the court should have applied Code of Civil Procedure section 529 (hereafter, section 529) by requiring Charlene to post a bond to secure payment of James's debt. We disagree and affirm the order.
|